Legal Opinion

Garrow v. Connecticut General Life Insurance

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 26, 1997PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DEL SOLE, Judge:

Following the denial of a claim for benefits under his employer’s long term disability benefits plan, Appellant commenced this lawsuit pursuant to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, (hereinafter “ERISA”), 29 U.S.C.A. § 1001 et seq. The trial court found that Appellant was so disabled that he was unable to engage in employment within the meaning of the terms of the plan, and that he was entitled to a net award, following the deduction for worker’s compensation benefits, of $98,804.32 plus pre-judgment interest at 6% per annum. Both sides filed motions for post-trial…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Paul F. McPherson v. Employees' Pension Plan of American Re-Insurance Company, Inc. Pension Committee of Employees' Pension PlanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  2. Chiropractic Nutritional Associates, Inc. v. Empire Blue Cross & Blue ShieldSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Arizona State Carpenters Pension Trust Fund v. Citibank (Arizona), an Arizona Banking CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Albuquerque Commons P'ship v. City CouncilNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Albuquerque Commons Partnership v. City CouncilNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API