Legal Opinion

Bordeaux v. Bordeaux

Montana Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 1904No. 1,770PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Appeal from, District Court, Silver Bow County; William Clancy, Judge. ActioN for divorce by John B. Bordeaux against Ella E. Bordeaux. From an order allowing defendant counsel fees, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

MR. COMMISSIONER OLATBERO

prepared the opinion for the court.

On January 28, 1899, plaintiff brought an action against defendant for a divorce. The trial was had in August, 1901, and resulted in a decree in favor of the plaintiff.

Pending the action, and upon application filed by the defendant on the 28th day of February, 1899, the court ordered the plaintiff to pay the defendant certain alimony and expenses of the suit and $600 for her attorneys “as a retainer. ” The order further provided: “And the matter of requiring the plaintiff to pay additional sums to the defendant for counsel fees…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Beadleston v. . BeadlestonNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  2. State ex rel. Gercke v. SeddonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1887
  3. Loveren v. LoverenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  4. McCarthy v. . McCarthyNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  5. Bordeaux v. BordeauxMontana Supreme Court · 1902

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Bordeaux v. BordeauxMontana Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Donaldson v. DonaldsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Albrecht v. AlbrechtMontana Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Grimstad v. JohnsonMontana Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Hynes v. BarnesMontana Supreme Court · 1904

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API