Legal Opinion

In re Richards Bros.

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided April 14, 1913PublishedCited by 3 opinions

In Bankruptcy. In the matter of Richards Bros., bankrupts. Application by bankrupts for allowance of exemptions, to which the receiver filed objections.

1Opinion of the Court

TUTTLE, District Judge.

Two brothers, Charles J. Richards and Harry Richards, entered into partnership, doing business under the firm name and style of “Richards Bros.” They did not file a certificate or do anything in the way of complying with Act No. 101 of the Public Acts of Michigan for 1907, which contains the following provision:

/‘No person or persons shall hereafter carry on or conduct or transact business in this state under any assumed name, or under any designation, name or style, corporate or otherwise, other than the real name or names of the individual or individuals owning,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Cashin v. PliterMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Carlock v. CagnacciCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Pendleton v. ClineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Guiterman v. WishonMontana Supreme Court · 1898
  5. McLean v. CrowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ives v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1934
  2. Bolen v. LigettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. Burns v. CassattNew York Supreme Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API