Legal Opinion · Dissent

Brogan v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 26, 1998No. 96-1579Published

1Dissent

Justice Stevens, with whom Justice Breyer joins,

dissenting.

Although I agree with nearly all of what Justice Ginsburg has written in her concurrence — a concurrence that raises serious concerns that the Court totally ignores — I dissent for the following reasons.

*419The mere fact that a false denial fits within the unqualified language of 18 U. S. C. § 1001 is not, in my opinion, a sufficient reason for rejecting a well-settled interpretation of that statute. It is not at all unusual for this Court to conclude that the literal text of a criminal statute is broader than the coverage intended by…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Behrens v. PelletierSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Central Bank of Denver, N. A. v. First Interstate Bank of Denver, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Staples v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. McNally v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Williams v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API