Legal Opinion · Dissent

Roselle v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided November 28, 1972No. A-17319Published

1DissentBrett, Judge

I am compelled to specifically dissent to this decision. On September 9, 1972, this Court dismissed the appeal from a direct contempt citation in Robinson v. State, Okl.Cr., 501 P.2d 215, for similar reasons without explaining what is meant by a “formal judgment and sentence” in direct contempt proceedings. So far as I know. *1296there is no printed form in the nature of a formal judgment and sentence for direct contempt proceedings. The text writers refer to “judgments or sentences” and “orders for committment”; and the cases which this Court has considered, in which the judgment and sentence was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fulreader v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
  2. Sullivan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1966
  3. Young v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1954
  4. Pate v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1967
  5. Robinson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API