Legal Opinion

Pate v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided June 14, 1967No. A-13952PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

The plaintiff in error, Whit Pate, who shall hereinafter be referred to as defendant, was subpoenaed before a Grand Jury in Oklahoma County, Oklahoma; called for the purpose of investigating purported bribery and “pay-offs” in connection with a horse racing bill presented to the Oklahoma Legislature.

Defendant refused to answer questions propounded to him before the Grand Jury on the grounds that the answers would tend to incriminate him. In other words, he claimed his privilege under the Fifth Amendment as it pertains to self-incrimination. The Grand Jury reported this to the District Judge…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ullmann v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. Scribner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913
  3. Ex Parte GudenogeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1909
  4. Fulreader v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
  5. In Re DriggsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Shapard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1967
  2. Alvarado v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Gilbert v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1982
  4. Padgett v. GrahamCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1973
  5. O'Rourke v. City of NormanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API