Legal Opinion

Winslow v. Collins

New York Court of Chancery

Decided January 3, 1831PublishedCited by 5 opinions

This was an appeal from so much of an interlocutory order of the vice chancellor of the 8th circuit as directed the complainant to pay the costs of the application.

1Opinion of the Court

The Chancellor.

The object of this appeal is to review the decision of the vice chancellor, allowing costs to the defendant, upon setting aside a proceeding of the complainant for an irregularity. The costs in this court, and particularly on special motions, are so entirely in the discretion of the court, that it must be a plain and palpable case of injustice which would authorize an appellate court to interfere, even if an appeal as to costs were expressly allowed by law. But I apprehend the appellant’s solicitor has entirely mistaken the practice of the court in supposing that an appeal…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Graves v. BlanchardNew York Supreme Court · 1850
  2. Thompson v. President of PatersonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1854
  3. Cook v. DickensonThe Superior Court of New York City · 1852
  4. Sledge v. ObenchainMississippi Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Couch v. MillardNew York Supreme Court · 1886

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API