Legal Opinion

United States v. Robert James Maker, A/K/A Robert Maker, A/K/A R.J. Mahar Constance Bridget Sullivan

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided December 28, 1984No. 83-5806, 83-5862PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

BECKER, Circuit Judge.

This appeal by the government pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3731 (1982) from the dismissal of a mail fraud indictment presents difficult questions regarding the interpretation of the double jeopardy clause of the fifth amendment. It also requires us to consider the elements necessary for proof of a single scheme to defraud.

The indictment charged the defendants, Robert James Maker and Constance B. Sullivan, with a single scheme to defraud in connection with insurance claims arising out of two motor-vehicle accidents in which Maker was involved. See 18 U.S.C.…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Evans v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  2. United States v. Gloria Zafiro, Jose Martinez, Salvador Garcia, and Alfonso SotoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
  3. United States v. De PeriCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
  4. State v. HamptonOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  5. State v. WidmaierSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1999

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API