United States v. Robert James Maker, A/K/A Robert Maker, A/K/A R.J. Mahar Constance Bridget Sullivan
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
BECKER, Circuit Judge.
This appeal by the government pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3731 (1982) from the dismissal of a mail fraud indictment presents difficult questions regarding the interpretation of the double jeopardy clause of the fifth amendment. It also requires us to consider the elements necessary for proof of a single scheme to defraud.
The indictment charged the defendants, Robert James Maker and Constance B. Sullivan, with a single scheme to defraud in connection with insurance claims arising out of two motor-vehicle accidents in which Maker was involved. See 18 U.S.C.…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Evans v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- United States v. Gloria Zafiro, Jose Martinez, Salvador Garcia, and Alfonso SotoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- United States v. De PeriCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- State v. HamptonOhio Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. WidmaierSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.