Legal Opinion

M. & M. Stamp Co. v. Harris

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1963PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice White

The only question presented for decision in this case is whether the appellant is liable for the privilege tax imposed by Item 106 of T.C.A. sec. 67-4203, which provides :

“Each trading stamp company or agency doing the business of selling, distributing, delivering, or giving away trading stamps or like devices in any county of this state, shall pay, per annum, in each county in which said company or agency does business, a privilege tax # # * ?>

*160On January 16, 1962, the Commissioner of Revenue of the State assessed the tax against the appellant which it paid under protest and then instituted…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Norton Co. v. Department of Revenue of Ill.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Ex Parte DrexelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Madison Suburban Utility Dist. v. CarsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Commonwealth v. Gibson Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907
  5. Family Discount Stamp Co. of Georgia v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1962

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Billy F. Hawk, Jr., GST Non-Exempt Marital Trust v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
  2. West v. PrattTennessee Supreme Court · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API