Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Stockham

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 20, 1899PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from the Superior Court of Baltimore City (Ritchie, J.)

1Opinion of the CourtPearce, J.

This is an appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Baltimore City quashing an attachment for fraud sued out of that Court by the appellant against the appellees, and based upon two promissory notes given by the appellees to the appellant, and upon an open account alleged to be due to the appellant from Grant Stockham, one of the appellees, as agent of his wife, Clara E. Stockham, the other appellee, all of which claims aggregate $450.81.

The affidavit charges only two of the four grounds specified in the statute, viz :

1st. That the appellees have assigned or disposed of, or are about to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Robertson v. ParksCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1892
  2. Buschman v. CoddCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1879
  3. Diggs v. DennyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1897

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Crookston State Bank v. LeeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  2. Langville v. LangvilleCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1948
  3. Kilpatrick v. InmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1909
  4. Lang v. ShanawolfCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1920
  5. Turner v. SpencerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1920

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API