Legal Opinion

People v. Madden

New York City Magistrates' Court

Decided January 3, 1939PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Brill, C. M.

The defendant is charged with violating section B32-93.0 of the Administrative Code of the City of New York in bhat he operated a motor truck as a public cart without a license bherefor.

The material facts of the case are not in dispute. Defendant was the driver of a motor truck owned by one Richard George who performed, under contract, a collection and delivery service for a forwarding concern known as the General Carloading Company. The latter was engaged solely in shipping by rail in interstate commerce. Defendant’s truck was exclusively employed either in collecting merchandise…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Swift & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  2. Hendrick v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. Sprout v. South BendSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  4. Barrett v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  5. Sprout v. City of South BendSupreme Court of the United States · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. SchiffGreat Neck Plaza Village Court · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API