Legal Opinion

Angelo Santamaria, Libelant-Appellant v. The Ss Othem, Fearnley & Egger, Inc., R. Myrsten & Rederi, A/b/volo

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided December 1, 1959No. 30, Docket 25602PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Libelant is a longshoreman who sustained injuries while engaged in unloading operations aboard respondent vessel. After presentation of evidence by both parties the court below entered a decree for respondent, holding that libel-ant’s injuries did not result from any unseaworthy condition of the ship. The opinion is reported at D.C.E.D.N.Y.1959, 170 F.Supp. 866.

Although libelant urges a different factual setting, the court below found that libelant sustained his injuries as the result of a loss of footing occasioned by rainwater which had left the deck slippery. Since this finding was not…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McAllister v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. Jackson v. Pittsburgh S. S. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1942
  3. Daniels v. Pacific-Atlantic S. S. Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1954
  4. Catherine Alison, as Administratrix of the Estate of Julian B. Alison, Deceased, Libelant-Appellant v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958
  5. Santamaria v. The SS OthemDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1959

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re Bridge Construction Services of Florida, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
  2. Zielinski v. Companhia De Navegacao Maritima NetumarDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1978
  3. Joseph Denaro, Libelant-Appellant v. United States v. American Stevedores, Inc., Respondent-Impleaded-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
  4. Tate v. A/B Svenska Amerika LineinDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1970
  5. Abruzzo v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API