Avis v. Board of Review of Indus. Com'n
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GREENWOOD, Judge:
Petitioner, Earl N. Avis, appeals from an Industrial Commission (Commission) order dismissing his claim for compensation on the basis that it was filed after the applicable three year statute of limitations had expired. We affirm the Commission’s order.
BACKGROUND
Because the Commission dismissed petitioner’s claim without a full hearing on the facts, “we presume, to the extent necessary to resolve the issues on appeal, that the facts are as stated by petitioner.” Velarde v. Board of Review, 831 P.2d 123, 124 n. 2 (Utah App.1992).
Petitioner was employed as a police…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Order of Railroad Telegraphers v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Berry by and Through Berry v. Beech AircraftUtah Supreme Court · 1985
- Wilson v. IsemingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Morton International, Inc. v. Auditing Division of the Utah State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1991
- Condemarin v. University HospitalUtah Supreme Court · 1989
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Vigos v. Mountainland Builders, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2000
- Colosimo v. Roman Catholic Bishop of Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 2007
- Selvage v. J.J. Johnson & AssociatesCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1996
- Waite v. Utah Labor Comm'nUtah Supreme Court · 2017
- Petersen v. Utah Labor Comm'nUtah Supreme Court · 2017
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.