Legal Opinion

Callaham v. Newsom

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 4, 1959No. 242PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRodman, J.

The trust agreement expressly authorizes the trustee to ¡sell the stock constituting the trust estate and reinvest the proceeds. There is no question of implied power. The only question presented is the duration of the power expressly given. Did the power to sell and reinvest terminate upon the death of Carl K. Callaham, the grantor, or does the power continue as long as the trustee has duties to perform?

When called upon to interpret a trust agreement or other contract, courts ¡seek to ascertain the intent of the parties and, when ascertained, give effect thereto, unless forbidden by law. In…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gould Morris Electric Co. v. Atlantic Fire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  2. DeBruhl v. State Highway & Public Works CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  3. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co. v. MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  4. Hall v. . WardwellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  5. In Re the Will of StimpsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Davison v. Duke UniversitySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  2. Greer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1971
  3. Baxter v. JonesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
  4. First Charter Bank v. American Children's HomeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
  5. In Re the Estate of WashburnCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API