Legal Opinion

Conklin v. Conklin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 11, 1908No. 2PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal by the plaintiff, Jeannie L. Conklin, from an order of ' the Supreme Court, made at the Kings County Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Kings on the 28th day of January, 1907, denying the plaintiff’s motion to punish the defendant for contempt of court for failing to pay alimony under a final judgment of divorce.

1Opinion of the Court

Hiller, J.:

The plaintiff’s motion to punish the defendant for contempt was denied because it did not appear presumptively to the satisfaction of the court that payment could not be enforced by means of sequestration proceedings, and an order sequestering the defendant’s personal property and .the rents and profits of his real *281property (the appeal from, which was argued herewith)* was made. Section 1773 of the Code of Civil Procedure provides that the order to show cause in contempt proceedings may he made without any previous sequestration or direction to give security where the court is…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Conklin v. ConklinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Uttal v. UttalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
  2. Stewart v. StewartNew York Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Goldman v. GoldmanNew York Supreme Court · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API