Legal Opinion

Rohm and Haas Co. v. Dawson Chemical Co.

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided May 13, 1986No. Civ. A. 74-H-790Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

CARL O. BUE, Jr., District Judge.

I. Introduction

On October 27, 1982 this Court, sitting without a jury held claims 1-3, 6, and 8-12 of the U.S. Patent No. 3,816,092 (RH Patent or Wilson Patent), issued June 11,1974, to Rohm and Haas Company as the assignee of the inventors, for “Herbicidal 3, 1 — dichloroanilides,” valid and infringed by Crystal Chemical Company and Joe C. Eller (collectively Crystal). 1 This Court ruled that misrepresentations and/or omissions by Rohm and Haas to the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) during the prosecution of the Wilson Patent were…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. California Motor Transport Co. v. Trucking UnlimitedSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. United States v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API