Legal Opinion

Iverson v. State Farm Mutual Insurance Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 2011No. 20081016PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Justice NEHRING,

opinion of the Court:

INTRODUCTION

T1 We have accepted certification of the following question from the United States District Court for the District of Utah: "Whether provision of lower limits for under-insured motorist coverage than for liability coverage properly complies with former Utah Code Ann. § 314A-22-805(90)(b) & (g) (currently codified under Utah Code Ann. § 31A-22-805.8)." We hold that such coverage may comply with the Utah Code so long as the insurer satisfies the consumer notification requirements contained in section 31A-22-305(9)(b) and (g) (the "UIM Statute") 1…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. In Re WorthenUtah Supreme Court · 1996
  2. American Deposit Ins. Co. v. MylesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2001
  3. Arbogast Family Trust v. River Crossings, LLCUtah Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Harvey v. Cedar Hills CityUtah Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Matheny v. Glen Falls InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States Fidelity & Guarantee Co. v. United States Sports Specialty Ass'nUtah Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Thayer v. Washington County School DistrictUtah Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Carranza v. United StatesUtah Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Lopez v. United Automobile Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Ray v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2015

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API