MacE v. Loetel
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
HAROLD L. LOWENSTEIN, Judge.
Karen Mace, personal representative of Gladys A. Rupard’s estate, filed a petition for discovery of assets, Section 473.340, 1 alleging that David Loetel unlawfully obtained money from Rupard prior to her death. The trial court entered judgment against Loetel, finding that he acquired $83,500 as “the result of either undue influence or fraudulent acts.” Loetel now appeals.
Facts
Rupard was a ninety-four year-old widow who was befriended by Loetel, fifty-five, late in life. 2 Loetel had been familiar with the Rupard family since the early 1970s, as his parents weré…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
- City National Bank & Trust Co. v. GravesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
- Godsy v. GodsyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1973
- Estate of Gross v. GrossMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
- Hodges v. HodgesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Landers v. SgourosMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
- Duerbusch v. KarasMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008
- Sleepy Hollow Ranch LLC v. RobinsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012
- In Re Adoption of CMBRSupreme Court of Missouri · 2011
- S.M. v. E.M.B.R.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2011