Legal Opinion

MacE v. Loetel

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 30, 2005No. WD 64154PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAROLD L. LOWENSTEIN, Judge.

Karen Mace, personal representative of Gladys A. Rupard’s estate, filed a petition for discovery of assets, Section 473.340, 1 alleging that David Loetel unlawfully obtained money from Rupard prior to her death. The trial court entered judgment against Loetel, finding that he acquired $83,500 as “the result of either undue influence or fraudulent acts.” Loetel now appeals.

Facts

Rupard was a ninety-four year-old widow who was befriended by Loetel, fifty-five, late in life. 2 Loetel had been familiar with the Rupard family since the early 1970s, as his parents weré…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  2. City National Bank & Trust Co. v. GravesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  3. Godsy v. GodsyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1973
  4. Estate of Gross v. GrossMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. Hodges v. HodgesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Landers v. SgourosMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Duerbusch v. KarasMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. Sleepy Hollow Ranch LLC v. RobinsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. In Re Adoption of CMBRSupreme Court of Missouri · 2011
  5. S.M. v. E.M.B.R.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API