Legal Opinion
United States v. 2050 Brickell Avenue
District Court, E.D. North Carolina
Decided March 1, 1988No. 87-753-CIV-5PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
BRITT, Chief Judge.
This matter is before the court on claimants’ motions to dismiss pursuant to Rules 12(b)(2) and 12(b)(5) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Delia and Dario Londono (hereinafter claimants) argue that this court lacks personal jurisdiction over the defendant res and, alternatively, that service of process by plaintiff was defective because the res is outside this court’s jurisdiction. The issues have been fully briefed, and the matter is now ripe for disposition.
FACTS
The United States of America brought this action seeking the civil forfeiture of certain real…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Shaffer v. HeitnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- United States v. Contents of Accounts Nos. 3034504504 & 144-07143 at Merrill, Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- United States v. 51 Pieces Of Real Property, Roswell, New MexicoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. 51 Pieces of Real PropertyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Parcel I, Beginning at a StakeDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 1990
- United States v. $633,021.67 in United States CurrencyDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.