Legal Opinion

United States v. 51 Pieces of Real Property

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided February 28, 1994No. 92-1346PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McKAY, Senior Circuit Judge.

Appellant Nitsua Management appeals the district court’s order of October 22, 1992, granting the government’s motion for default judgment and final order of forfeiture of certain real property located in New Mexico, and denying Nitsua’s various motions, including a motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction.1

The government sought to forfeit the New Mexico property pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 981, 1341,1343, and 1956 because it allegedly was purchased in furtherance of a money laundering scheme engaged in by Donald Austin, who was indicted with others by a federal…

2Cases cited52 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Bowen v. Georgetown University HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Omni Capital International, Ltd. v. Rudolf Wolff & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Dennis Garberg & Associates, Inc. v. Pack-Tech International Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
  2. John Mann v. David CastielCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2012
  3. United States v. 51 Pieces Of Real Property, Roswell, New MexicoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
  4. United States v. ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
  5. Aero-Medical, Inc., an Oklahoma Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API