Legal Opinion

Hammond v. City of Miami

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 31, 1981No. 80-1289PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The final judgment appealed from is affirmed on the basis that: (1) the underlying proceeding before the Retirement Board of the City of Miami seeking accidental disability pension pursuant to Resolution No. 39802 adopted June 20,1968 was quasi-judicial in nature, De Groot v. Sheffield, 95 So.2d 912 (Fla.1957); Bloomfield v. Mayo, 119 So.2d 417 (Fla. 1st DCA 1960), and culminated in an order rendered March 7, 1975; (2) under the then-applicable and governing provisions of Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 4.1 and 4.5c(l), the order was reviewable within sixty days from rendition; and (3)…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. De Groot v. SheffieldSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
  2. Bloomfield v. MayoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960
  3. Central Truck Lines v. BoydSupreme Court of Florida · 1958

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hampton v. Miami City Employees Retirement SystemDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API