Legal Opinion

Bloomfield v. Mayo

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 12, 1960No. B-346PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

119 So.2d 417 (1960)

Lloyd P. BLOOMFIELD, Doing Business As Hari-Kari Distributing Company, Petitioner,

v.

Nathan MAYO, As Commissioner of Agriculture of the State of Florida, Respondent.

No. B-346.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. First District.

April 12, 1960.

Fuller Warren and Kenneth L. Ryskamp, Miami, for petitioner.

Wm. C. Pierce, Tampa, for respondent.

WIGGINTON, Chief Judge.

Petitioner seeks review by certiorari of a purported judgment denying certiorari in a proceeding instituted by it in the Circuit Court of Leon County.

Petitioner manufactures a pesticide product marketed under the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. De Groot v. SheffieldSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
  2. Florida Motor Lines, Inc. v. Railroad CommissionersSupreme Court of Florida · 1930
  3. State Ex Rel. Wedgworth Farms, Inc. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1958
  4. State v. FurenSupreme Court of Florida · 1960
  5. Codomo v. ShawSupreme Court of Florida · 1958

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Dept. of General Serv. v. WillisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
  2. Modlin v. City of Miami BeachSupreme Court of Florida · 1967
  3. Saldin Securities, Inc. v. Snohomish CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Scholastic Systems, Inc. v. LeloupSupreme Court of Florida · 1974
  5. School Bd. of Leon County v. MitchellDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API