Legal Opinion
Giannotti v. De Bock
Nevada Supreme Court
Decided January 5, 1924No. 2608PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*333By the Court,
Coleman, J.:
This is an appeal from the' judgment. No motion for a new trial was made in the action.
Counsel for respondent contends that we cannot consider the-evidence in the case, since no motion for a new trial was made. In this contention he is clearly right, as we have repeatedly held. Section 386 of our civil code (Rev. Laws, 5328) reads:
“Where the appeal is based upon the ground that the evidence is insufficient to justify the verdict or decision of the court, or to support the findings, * * * a motion for a new trial must be made and determined before the appeal is taken.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Gill v. Goldfield Consolidated Mines Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1919
- Wintler Abstract & Loan Co. v. SearsWashington Supreme Court · 1919
3Cited by9 opinions
- Water Co. v. Belmont Dev. Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1926
- Snyder v. GarrettNevada Supreme Court · 1941
- Craig v. HarrahNevada Supreme Court · 1948
- Hilton v. HymersNevada Supreme Court · 1937
- Neill Et Ux. v. MikulichNevada Supreme Court · 1937
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.