Legal Opinion

Giannotti v. De Bock

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 1924No. 2608PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*333By the Court,

Coleman, J.:

This is an appeal from the' judgment. No motion for a new trial was made in the action.

Counsel for respondent contends that we cannot consider the-evidence in the case, since no motion for a new trial was made. In this contention he is clearly right, as we have repeatedly held. Section 386 of our civil code (Rev. Laws, 5328) reads:

“Where the appeal is based upon the ground that the evidence is insufficient to justify the verdict or decision of the court, or to support the findings, * * * a motion for a new trial must be made and determined before the appeal is taken.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gill v. Goldfield Consolidated Mines Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Wintler Abstract & Loan Co. v. SearsWashington Supreme Court · 1919

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Water Co. v. Belmont Dev. Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Snyder v. GarrettNevada Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Craig v. HarrahNevada Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Hilton v. HymersNevada Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Neill Et Ux. v. MikulichNevada Supreme Court · 1937

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API