Legal Opinion

Craig v. Harrah

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided June 25, 1948No. 3541PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

The parties will be designated in this opinion as plaintiff and defendant, as they were in the lower court.

1. The defendant has made application to this court to extend his time within which to file bill of exceptions, and has stated as grounds or reasons for such requested extension "that said bill of exceptions has already been filed, but that opposing counsel has refused to stipulate for extension of time within which to file said bill of exceptions, or that said bill of exceptions may be filed." The defendant has not stated when he made such request of counsel, nor whether same was…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. McGill v. LewisNevada Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Whitmore v. ShiverickNevada Supreme Court · 1867
  3. Corbett v. JobNevada Supreme Court · 1869
  4. Water Co. v. Belmont Dev. Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Peri v. JeffersNevada Supreme Court · 1930

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Craig v. HarrahNevada Supreme Court · 1949
  2. State Ex Rel. Department of Highways v. PinsonNevada Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Dillon v. DillonNevada Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Harrah v. CraigCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  5. Barlow v. Western Pacific RailroadNevada Supreme Court · 1951

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API