Legal Opinion

Mercer v. Crocker

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 19, 1985No. 847SC470Published

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Judge.

The plaintiff appeals from a directed verdict. The question on appeal is whether the evidence, considered in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, is sufficient to present a question for the jury. See Bowen v. Gardner, 275 N.C. 363, 168 S.E. 2d 47 (1969); Watt v. Crews, 261 N.C. 143, 134 S.E. 2d 199 (1964). We hold that it is.

The defendants alleged in their motion for directed verdict that Darrin Mercer was contributorily negligent. Yet, Darrin was thirteen years of age on 28 July 1980. He thus benefits from the rule that a person between the ages of seven and fourteen is…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bowen v. GardnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  2. Kellogg v. ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  3. Hamilton v. McCashSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  4. Watt v. CrewsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  5. Edwards Ex Rel. Edwards v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API