Legal Opinion

Coryell v. Dubois Borough

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 11, 1909No. Appeal, No. 266PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal, No. 266, Jan. T., 1908, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. Clearfield Co., Dec. T., 1904, No. 31, for plaintiffs on case tried by the court without a jury in suit of B. H. Coryell and O. B. Bovard, doing business as The Coryell Construction Company, v. Dubois Borough. Assumpsit to recover a balance due on a municipal contract.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 266, Jan. T., 1908, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. Clearfield Co., Dec. T., 1904, No. 31, for plaintiffs on case tried by the court without a jury in suit of B. H. Coryell and O. B. Bovard, doing business as The Coryell Construction Company, v. Dubois Borough. Assumpsit to recover a balance due on a municipal contract. The case was tried by Ormerod, P. J., specially presiding without a jury under the provisions of the Act of April 22, 1874, P. L. 109. The facts of the case are stated in the opinion of the Supreme Court. The court entered judgment in favor of the plaintiffs…

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Stewart,

The plaintiff company engaged by written contract to construct for the borough of Dubois, as part of a projected municipal water supply system, a section of the work designated in the plan as Anderson Creek dam or reservoir, in accordance with certain specifications, for the sum of $24,482.30. This price was based on estimates furnished by the borough as to the probable amount of work and material that would be required. Had there been no departure from the original plans and specifications, these estimates would have proved sufficiently accurate, and no…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Schuylkill Navigation Co. v. MooreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1837

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. City of Houston v. L. J. Fuller, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1958
  2. Pressy v. McCornackSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
  3. Ritchie v. City of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
  4. Carroll Electric Co. v. Irwin & LeightonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  5. Ferro-Concrete Co. v. Northampton CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API