Legal Opinion
Oberman & Co. v. Pratt
District Court, W.D. Missouri
Decided October 8, 1936No. 2827PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REEVES, District Judge.
By its bill the plaintiff seeks a permanent injunction and a declaratory judgment. The only matter for consideration now, however, is that of a temporary injunction. Heretofore a temporary restraining order was issued and the status quo is now being maintained by the order. The defendants not only resist the application for a temporary injunction, but they have filed their motion to dismiss the bill. Moreover, the nonresident defendants have challenged the validity of process served upon them. The defendant George O. Pratt is the only resident defendant.
The suit…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- A. L. A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Swift & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Stafford v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Hammer v. DagenhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Lemke v. Farmers Grain Co. of EmbdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Friedman-Harry Marks Clothing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- National Labor Relations Board v. Friedman-Harry Marks Clothing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937