Legal Opinion · Dissent

National Labor Relations Board v. Friedman-Harry Marks Clothing Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 12, 1937No. 422 and 423Published

1Dissent

*76Me. Justice McReynolds

delivered the following dissenting opinion in the cases preceding:

Mr. Justice Van Devanter, Mr. Justice Sutherland, Mr. Justice Butler and I are unable to agree with the decisions just announced.

We conclude that these causes were rightly decided by the three Circuit Courts of Appeals and that their judgments should be affirmed. The opinions there given without dissent are terse, well-considered and sound. They disclose the meaning ascribed by experienced judges to what this Court has often declared, and are set out below in full.

Considering the far-reaching import of…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Appts. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  2. A. L. A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Swift & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  4. In Re DebsSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  5. Carter v. Carter Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API