Legal Opinion

In Re Chinese Manufactured Drywall Products

District Court, E.D. Louisiana

Decided April 8, 2010No. MDL No. 2047PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

706 F.Supp.2d 655 (2010)

In re CHINESE MANUFACTURED DRYWALL PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION.

This Document Relates to Germano, et al.

v.

Taishan Gypsum Co. Ltd., et al. case no. 09-6687.

MDL No. 2047.

United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana.

April 8, 2010.

Phillip A. Wittmann, Stone, Pigman, Walther, Wittmann, LLC, Judy Y. Barrasso Barrasso, Usdin, Kupperman, Freeman & Sarver, LLC, New Orleans, LA, for Chinese Manufactured Drywall Products Liability Litigation.

FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

ELDON E. FALLON, District Judge.

TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Background & Procedural History…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Gallick v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Bowers v. Westvaco Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1992
  3. Packett v. HerbertSupreme Court of Virginia · 1989
  4. In Re Chinese Manufactured Drywall Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2010
  5. Averett v. ShircliffSupreme Court of Virginia · 1977

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Germano v. Taishan Gypsum Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014
  2. Kent Holifield v. City Salvage, Inc.Court of Appeals of Mississippi · 2017
  3. Bishop v. Alfa Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2011
  4. In Re: Chinese-ManufacturedCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014
  5. Karpel v. Gebrueder Knauf Verwaltungsgesellschaft, KGDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2022

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API