Cunningham v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
Judge SIMPSON.
Before this Court in its original jurisdiction is a preliminary objection in the nature of a demurrer filed by the Depart ment of Corrections (DOC), to a petition for review in the nature of a complaint in mandamus (complaint) filed by unrepresented inmate Rashad Cunningham. Relying on DOC Policy DC-ADM 003 (relating to the release of inmate information), Cunningham, representing himself, seeks to have DOC provide, from its own records, his pre-sentence investigation report. Because we agree with DOC that Cunningham’s complaint is legally insufficient to state a cause…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Lawrence v. Pennsylvania Department of CorrectionsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Portalatin v. Department of CorrectionsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
3Cited by3 opinions
- McGinley v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- A. Brown v. J. WetzelCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- W.E. Webster III v. Lehigh County Adult Probation and ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2019