Legal Opinion
Mary Scanapico v. Richmond, Fredericksburg & Potomac Railroad Company, and Seaboard Air Line Railroad Company and Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided December 18, 1970No. 34256_1PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAYS, Circuit Judge:
This is an appeal from an order of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York denying defendant’s motion to quash the service of summons. It is here by permission of this court, granted upon the statement of the district judge under 28 U. S.C. § 1292(b) (1964) that the order
“[i]nvolves a controlling question of law as to which there is substantial ground for difference of opinion and that an immediate appeal from the order may materially advance the ultimate termination of the litigation. * * *>>
Appellee sued for injuries sustained when a…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Perkins v. Benguet Consolidated Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Wells Fargo & Co. v. Wells Fargo Express Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Bulova Watch Co., Inc. v. K. Hattori & Co., Ltd.District Court, E.D. New York · 1981
- Jacintoport Corp. v. Greater Baton Rouge Port CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- Top Form Mills, Inc. v. Sociedad Nationale Industria Applicazioni ViscosaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1977
- Daniel v. American Board of Emergency MedicineDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1997
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.