Legal Opinion
United States v. Ingram
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided February 10, 2010No. 09-2121PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRIGHT, Circuit Judge.
This case comes before us for the second time. In the first case, an interlocutory appeal under 21 U.S.C. § 851(d)(2), the government argued the single issue that the district court erred in not determining that Ingram had a prior penalty-enhancing felony drug conviction that would have required him to serve a mandatory-minimum 20-year sentence. We remanded on this sentencing issue for further consideration. See United States v. Ingram, 309 Fed.Appx. 66 (8th Cir.2009). After hearing additional evidence from the government on remand, the district court 1 determined Ingram…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Greenlaw v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Aaron M. Deroo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
- City of Sherrill v. Oneida Indian Nation of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Long Island Savings Bank, FSB v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
- Ballard v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. VanoverCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. John Ways, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
- Michael Ingram v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2019
- United States v. GayekparCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. CarlsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.