Legal Opinion
United States v. David Michael Rehfield
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 16, 1969No. 23094_1PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DUNIWAY, Circuit Judge:
Rehfield was adjudged guilty of knowingly destroying his draft card in violation of 50 U.S.C.App. § 462(b) and of knowingly failing to possess his draft card in violation of 50 U.S.C.App. § 460. 1 The trial judge sentenced him as a “young adult offender” under 18 U.S.C. §§ 4209, 5010(b); this single order of commitment applied to the conviction under both charges. We affirm.
1. Section 462(b) is constitutional.
Rehfield asserts that the 1965 amendment of Section 12(b) (3) of the Universal Military Training and Service Act (now the Selective Service Act of 1967), 50…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Richard B. Carter v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1962
- Donald Bernard Cunningham v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
- Michael Waldo Simmons v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- David S. Kotz v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Lois Sero v. Peter PreiserCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Robert Cloyd Rusk v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- Dick Alexander Caldwell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
- United States v. Marco Alfonso RamirezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Sate ex rel. K. V. N.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1971
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.