Legal Opinion
State v. Windom
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
Decided May 5, 1992No. 91-1938-CRPublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, J.
Lance D. Windom appeals from a judgment of conviction and from an order denying both his postconviction motion to vacate the sentence ordered after his parole revocation and his motion for resentencing before a different judge. Windom complains that his right to effective assistance of counsel, guaranteed by U.S. Constitution Amendment VI and by Wisconsin Constitution Article I, Section 7, was violated when his attorney failed to object to the State's breach of a plea agreement when it made a sentence recommendation at the resentencing hearing. We conclude that the State did not breach the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. Michael Lee HarveyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Peter A. Crusco and Phillip A. Cimmino. Appeal of Phillip CimminoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- United States v. Thomas J. BowlerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978
- United States v. Jane ReadCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Warren v. SchwarzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. WilliamsWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
- Kernz v. J. L. French Corp.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2003
- State v. ToliverCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1994
- State v. ZanelliCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1997
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.