Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

State Ex Rel. Summerfield v. Maxwell

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided April 17, 1964No. 12328Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Haymond, President,

dissenting in part and concurring in part.

As I firmly believe that mandamus is not the proper remedy to compel a county board of ballot commissioners to omit or remove from an election ballot the name of any candidate who has filed and has been certified by the proper authority as a candidate to be voted for in a primary election, I dissent from the holding of the majority of this Court which, adhering to the erroneous and ill considered cases of State ex rel. Duke v. O’Brien, 145 W. Va. 600, 117 S. E. 2d 353; State ex rel. Zickefoose v. West, 145 W. Va. 498, 116 S. E. 2d…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Bumgardner v. MillsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1949
  2. State ex rel. Matheny v. County Court of Wyoming CountyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Adams v. LondereeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1954
  4. State ex rel. Zickefoose v. WestWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Pack v. KarnesWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1918

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API