Legal Opinion

Providence Teachers Union v. Napolitano

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided March 5, 1997No. 95-283-AppealPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Effective January 3, 1983, § 1210 of the Providence Home Rule Charter of 1980 (the charter) required all of the defendant city of Providence’s employees, including employees of the school department, to be residents of the city during their employment. In November 1990, voters removed the residency requirement for most municipal employees, including certified school teachers. Two years later, Providence voters reinstituted the residency requirement for all new city workers employed after January 1,1993. As amended, § 1210 of the charter now provides that:

“All * * * employees of the…

3Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Fireman's Fund Insurance v. E.W. Burman, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1978
  2. State v. CianciSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1985
  3. Vincent Co. v. First National Supermarkets, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1996
  4. Langton v. DemersSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1980
  5. Sasso v. StateSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by12 opinions

  1. Sullivan v. ChafeeSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1997
  2. Meyer v. City of NewportSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2004
  3. SAM M. EX REL. ELLIOTT v. ChafeeDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2011
  4. Providence Teachers' Union Local 958 v. City Council of ProvidenceSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2005
  5. Coxcom, Inc. v. Picerne Real Estate Group, 02-1537 (2003)Superior Court of Rhode Island · 2003

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API