Legal Opinion

Harman v. Moss

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Decided September 20, 1917PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from a decree of the Circuit Court of Tazewell county. Decree for complainant. Defendant appeals. STATEMENT OF THE CASE. This is the second appeal in this cause.

Read the full summary

Appeal from a decree of the Circuit Court of Tazewell county. Decree for complainant. Defendant appeals. STATEMENT OF THE CASE. This is the second appeal in this cause. The case on the former appeal is reported in 117 Va. 676, 86 S. E. 111. That appeal involved the decree of the court below entered at the November term, 1913, by which appellees were allowed certain recoveries therein set forth against W. F. Harman the appellant, being purchase money for certain timber sold by appellant to the W. M. Ritter Lumber Company under a certain agreement between appellees and others with appellant of…

1Opinion of the CourtSims, J.

The assignments of error and cross-error before us raise the questions for our decision which will be disposed of in their order as stated below.

1. What was a reasonable compensation to appellant for his services in making the sale of timber in controversy in this causej

We think the finding of the commissioner iu favor of appellant on this question, above stated — of 10 per cent, of the share of appéllees in the purchase money for said timber — allows the former a reasonable compensation for his services aforesaid, for the reason stated by the commis*407sioner quoted above. The facts and…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Moore v. TurnerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Safway Steel Scaffolds of Virginia, Inc. v. CoulterSupreme Court of Virginia · 1956
  3. McLean v. HillSupreme Court of Virginia · 1946
  4. Moore v. TurnerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API