Legal Opinion

Gray v. City of Omaha

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 8, 1908No. 15,010PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from the district court for Douglas county: Alexander O. Troup, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Galkins, 0.

An ordinance of the city of Omaha made it unlawful for any person to construct artificial stone, asphalt or other composite walks without a license therefor. Section 2 of this ordinance, which contained its material provisions, was as follows: “Any person, firm or corporation desiring to engage in the construction of artificial stone, asphalt or other composite sidewalks in the city, shall bo required to apply for a license to the mayor and city council; such license to expire on December 31st of each year. The condition of the issuance of such license to be the payment of ten…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Anderson v. City of WellingtonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888
  2. City of St. Paul v. TraegerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1878

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. City of Tucson v. StewartArizona Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Portland v. Portland Ry., L. & P. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1916
  3. State v. City of SheridanWyoming Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Jewel Tea Co. v. City of GenevaNebraska Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Malone v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 2016

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API