Legal Opinion

Holland & Knight, LLP v. Alan Deatley

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 24, 2009No. 08-35814UnpublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM *

We affirm the district court’s decision granting summary judgment to law firm Holland & Knight on Alan DeAtley’s counterclaim for legal malpractice in this diversity suit based on Washington law.

DeAtley was judicially estopped from asserting the counterclaim. DeAtley had claimed an interest in his father’s paving business, Superior Asphalt, at the time he filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy, yet he chose not to list it as an asset. This deprived DeAtley’s creditors of his claim of a share in the business, so that DeAtley’s debts were discharged without the creditors being able to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lawrence Hamilton v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Company, an Illinois Corporation David's Restaurant SupplyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  2. Eastman v. Union Pacific RailroadCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
  3. Cusano v. KleinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  4. Daugert v. PappasWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Steven Gregory Dunmore v. United States of America, Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kurchack v. Life Insurance Co. of North AmericaDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API