Watson v. Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority
District Court, D. New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BIUNNO, District Judge.
The facts before the court are relatively simple and straightforward. One James Watson, a New York resident and citizen, was a bus driver for defendant Manhattan and Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority (MaBSTOA), a public benefit corporation created under § 1203-a of the New York Public Authorities Law.
Under a collective bargaining agreement between MaBSTOA and the Transport Workers Union of America, Mr. Watson was a participant in a “presumed” retirement benefit plan, also called a “death gamble”, this being a right afforded to New York City governmental…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- In Re BurrusSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Barber v. Barber Ex Rel. CronkhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1859
- Markham v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Leonardis v. Burns International Security Services, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1992
- Big Island Yacht Sales, Inc. v. DowtyDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1993
- Acevedo v. Essex CountyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985
- Harris v. KELLOGG, BROWN & ROOT SERVICES, INC.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
- Camilli v. Immaculate Conception CemeteryNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1990
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.