Legal Opinion

Watson v. Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided April 17, 1980No. Civ. 80-623PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BIUNNO, District Judge.

The facts before the court are relatively simple and straightforward. One James Watson, a New York resident and citizen, was a bus driver for defendant Manhattan and Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority (MaBSTOA), a public benefit corporation created under § 1203-a of the New York Public Authorities Law.

Under a collective bargaining agreement between MaBSTOA and the Transport Workers Union of America, Mr. Watson was a participant in a “presumed” retirement benefit plan, also called a “death gamble”, this being a right afforded to New York City governmental…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. In Re BurrusSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  4. Barber v. Barber Ex Rel. CronkhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1859
  5. Markham v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1946

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Leonardis v. Burns International Security Services, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1992
  2. Big Island Yacht Sales, Inc. v. DowtyDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1993
  3. Acevedo v. Essex CountyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985
  4. Harris v. KELLOGG, BROWN & ROOT SERVICES, INC.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
  5. Camilli v. Immaculate Conception CemeteryNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1990

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API