Clark v. Collier
California Supreme Court
Appeal from, a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Vanclief, C.
Action to recover a balance of $825 alleged to be due and owing from defendant to plaintiff on a written building contract; and also $50 for extra work. The cause was tried by the court. The judgment was in favor of the defendant. The plaintiff has appealed from the judgment and from an order denying his motion for a new trial.
By the contract the plaintiff agreed to repair an old house and to build a new addition thereto to be attached to it. The old house was to be turned partly round, removed from its old foundation, and placed on a new brick foundation, to be laid by plaintiff…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Wehrung v. DenhamOregon Supreme Court · 1903
- Hayes v. GrossAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
- Hogan v. Globe Mutual Building & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Kanzius v. JenkinsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
- O'Brien v. GaribaldiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.