Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Coleman v. City of Clay Center

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 5, 1907No. 15,404PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error from Clay district court; Sam Kimble, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Burch, J.:

The suit in the district court was commenced to restrain the defendants from issuing, selling and delivering bonds of the city in the sum of $25,000, which had been voted at a special election for the purpose of constructing works to supply the inhabitants of the city with electric light. The election was held under the provisions of chapter 101 of the Laws of 1905. Section 2 of the act reads as follows:

“Whenever the city council of any such city shall desire to procure authority for the issuance of bonds under the terms of this act, they…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Clark v. City of JanesvilleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1860
  2. Warsop v. City of HastingsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1876

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Board of Ed. of Oklahoma City v. WoodworthSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  2. Town of Afton v. GillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. Smith v. FuestSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928
  4. City of Clay Center v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API