Legal Opinion

City of Wichita Falls v. Mauldin

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 12, 1929No. 12191. [fn*]PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConner, C. J.

This is an appeal from a judgment in appellees’ favor for the sum of $525 as damages caused by an overflow'of their premises. The city of Wichita Falls denied liability. The briefs of the parties and the records are somewhat voluminous, but we think the case can be disposed of briefly. The facts out of which appellees’ action arose are substantially as follows: Appellees owned lot 8 in block 8 of one of the additions to the city of Wichita Falls; the lot faces Broad avenue, a graded street which extends north and south and intersects Twenty-First street, which runs east and west; one small…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Austin & Northwestern Railway Co. v. AndersonTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Clark v. DyerTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Pecos & N. T. Ry. Co. v. GrundyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  4. Gulf, Col. & S. F. R'y Co. v. HelsleyTexas Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Houston & Texas Central Railway Co. v. EllisTexas Supreme Court · 1920

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. City of Wichita Falls v. MauldinTexas Commission of Appeals · 1931
  2. Western Cotton Oil Co. v. MayesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
  3. Anderson Furniture Co. v. RodenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952
  4. City of Brady v. CoxCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  5. Chicago Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. HarknessCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API