Owens v. Snodgrass

Owens sued Snodgrass and his wife, in an action of tresnass on the case, for imputed fraud in a contract for an v ’ r . .... exchange of “their” horse for his — averring, m his declaration, that, to induce him to make the exchange, they, the husband and wife, though they both knew that “ their ” horse was secretly and irremediably diseased, falsely and fraudulently represented to him, that it was J , , a sound horse.

*230The Circuit Court having sustained a demurrer to the declaration, Owens now seeks a reversal of that judgment.

As we cannot, from any thing averred, presume, either that Mrs.…