Prentiss v. Paisley
Supreme Court of Florida
Appeal from the Circuit Court from Marion County. Thefacts ot the case are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
Raney, C. J.:
This is an appeal from an order denying an injunction and dismissing a bill of review.
The bill of review considered as one for error of law apparent upon the face of the record is maintainable. The term, record, as used in connection with such bills, meaus the pleadings and decree in the canse as to which the complaint is made. Whiting vs. Bank of the United States, 13 Peters, 6; Shelton vs. Van Kleeck, 106 U. S., 532. Looking at the Paisley decree complained ol, we perceive one of its features to be a personal recovery against Mrs. Prentiss, and the pleading or bill shows the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- WHITING v. the Bank of the United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
- Kowing v. . ManlyNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
- Lewis v. YaleSupreme Court of Florida · 1852
- Shelton v. Van KleeckSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Baum v. . MullenNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Banfield Et Ux. v. Addington Et Ux.Supreme Court of Florida · 1932
- Hancock v. HancockSupreme Court of Florida · 1908
- Bryan v. BullockSupreme Court of Florida · 1922
- Greene v. Miller Et Ux.Supreme Court of Florida · 1931
- Trapnell v. ConklynWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1892
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.