Legal Opinion

Paul S. Burka and Robert A. Burka, Trustees v. Aetna Life Insurance Company, Trustees

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided June 23, 1995No. 94-7129PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellants Paul and Robert Burka, trustees of a family trust, challenge the Aetna Life Insurance Company’s ownership of a parcel of land formerly held for the Trust. The district court granted Aetna’s motion for summary judgment, ruling that the Trust’s former trustee had not exceeded his authority when he executed three documents pledging the Trust’s interests in the land as security for a construction loan. The district court also held that appellants were not entitled to ground rents for the period between the default on that loan and the foreclosure sale. We affirm the district court’s…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Ehrenhaft v. Malcolm Price, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. American University Park Citizens Ass'n v. BurkaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. In Re 1301 Connecticut Avenue AssociatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1991

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Paul S. Burka, and Robert A. Burka, Trustees v. Aetna Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
  2. National Railroad Passenger Corp. v. Lexington InsuranceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
  3. McKesson Corp. v. Islamic Republic of IranDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2000
  4. Purepac Pharmaceutical Co. v. ThompsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002
  5. Burra v. Aetna Life InsuranceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API