Legal Opinion

People v. Williams

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 21, 1996PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

We exercise our discretion to review here, notwithstanding defendant’s failure to preserve his claims by timely objection at trial, because the court’s response to the jury note requesting a clearer definition of "force” was so misleading and prejudicial as to deprive defendant of a fair trial (People v McCullough, 73 AD2d 310, 319; People v Branch, 54 AD2d 90, 93). While a trial court is permitted to use hypotheticals to aid the jury’s understanding of the matter before them, the hypothetical must be fair and must not reflect the court’s opinion as to how the issues should be resolved (see,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Truck Rent-A-Center, Inc. v. Puritan Farms 2nd, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. People v. BellNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. People v. MiddletonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  4. People v. McCulloughAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  5. People v. FlynnNew York Supreme Court · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. CookAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  2. Fong v. PooleDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2007
  3. People v. WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API