Legal Opinion

Robert Mata v. George Sumner

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 31, 1980No. 78-2636PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ELY, Circuit Judge:

Robert Mata (“appellant”) appeals from the District Court’s denial of his Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. The Petition followed the appellant’s conviction of murder in a California state court and his exhaustion of all available state court remedies.

We reverse the District Court’s Order upon the basis of our conclusion that state authorities violated rights given to the appellant by the federal Constitution. First, the pre-trial photographic identification procedure employed by state police was so impermissibly suggestive as to give rise to a very substantial likelihood…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Sumner v. MataSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Sumner v. MataSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. United States v. Jerald Lee SimsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  4. United States v. Robert Edward FieldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  5. United States v. Raymond A. Huberts, United States of America v. Shirley L. ShelleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API