Legal Opinion

United States v. Robert Edward Field

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 1, 1980No. 79-1533PublishedCited by 81 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALLACE, Circuit Judge:

Field was convicted of armed bank robbery pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a), (d). On appeal he claims that certain eye witness evidence admitted by the district court violated his right to due process of law, and that certain rulings by the district court were erroneous. We agree with Field’s due process claim and reverse the conviction.

I

On the morning of March 6, 1979, two men robbed a Barclay’s Bank located in Woodland Hills, California. During the robbery, which lasted one and one-half to two minutes, the shorter of the two robbers brandished a pistol and took money…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Manson v. BrathwaiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Coleman v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by81 opinions

  1. Patrick James Jeffries v. Tana Wood, SuperintendentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  2. Tuan Van Tran v. Gary Lindsey, Warden Salinas Valley State Prisons State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  3. United States v. Donald Gene BoothCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  4. United States v. Carlo Scott BagleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  5. Francis Ordean Reese v. Thomas A. FulcomerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991

76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API