Legal Opinion

Schmidt v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided September 7, 1989No. 01-88-00858-CRPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COHEN, Justice.

Appellant pled no contest to failure to stop and render aid, pursuant to a plea agreement, and the trial court assessed punishment of four years imprisonment.

Appellant contends that the controlling statute, Tex.Rev.Civ.Stat.Ann. sec. 6701d, sec. 38 (Vernon 1977), is unconstitutional and void. The State does not respond to this point of error, but argues that we lack jurisdiction because the notice of appeal does not state the trial court gave permission to appeal, nor does it list the pretrial rulings that appellant seeks to appeal.

Rule 40(b)(1) provides:

[I]f the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Middleton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
  2. Jiles v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1988
  3. Platter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
  4. Ragon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
  5. Young v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lopez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1992
  2. Martin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992
  3. Gates, Patsey Gunn v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API